Skip to content
 

Mentor-Mentee Matching Template

Facilitate Connections · Drive Engagement · Scale Development

Mentor-Mentee Matching Template

The Role of Matching in Effective Mentorship

Mentorship outcomes begin with the right connection. Without a thoughtful matching process, even well-intentioned programs can struggle to gain traction. Effective matching fosters compatibility, promotes trust, and maximizes the potential of each relationship.

Key Benefits:

  • Increases likelihood of long-term engagement
  • Enhances mentee satisfaction and growth outcomes
  • Reduces early drop-out or misalignment
  • Aligns mentorship with organizational goals
  • Facilitates scalable, data-informed program design

Matching Criteria Overview

Establish clear and consistent criteria to guide the pairing process. These criteria can be prioritized based on program goals, participant demographics, and organizational values.

Criteria

Description

Example

Skills & Expertise

Align mentor's strengths with mentee's growth areas

Leadership, Coding, Public Speaking

Career Goals  

Match by future aspirations 

Transitioning to management, building a personal brand

Function/Department    

Ensure relevance and context

Finance mentor for Finance mentee

Experience Level    

Balance learning opportunity and relatability  

5+ years vs. entry-level

Location/Time Zone    

Enable timely, accessible interactions   

Remote, hybrid, or office-based

Preferred Communication Style 

Align expectations around cadence and tone   

Structured sessions vs. informal chats

 

 

Types of Matching Approaches

There’s no one-size-fits-all approach. Programs may select from the following methods based on scale, resources, and desired outcomes.

Method

Description

Suitable For

Manual Matching

The program admin manually reviews participant data

Small programs, high customization

Self-Matching    

Mentees select mentors from a curated list

Empowerment-driven models

Algorithmic Matching    

Automated pairings based on predefined criteria

Scalable, large programs

Hybrid Matching    

Combines algorithmic suggestions with admin oversight

Medium-to-large programs needing both efficiency and control

 

 

Step-by-Step Matching Process

Use this step-by-step process to guide structured, equitable, and goal-aligned mentor-mentee pairings:

Step

Description

1 · Collect Profile Data

Gather information through onboarding forms or surveys

2 · Define Matching Priorities

Rank key criteria (e.g., goals, function, experience)

3 · Select Matching Method

Choose manual, algorithmic, or hybrid

4 · Execute Match

Perform pairings and notify participants

5 · Review & Adjust

Monitor satisfaction and re-match if necessary

 

Sample Matching Rubric

Matching Category

Weight (%)

Mentor Attribute

Mentee Attribute

Match Score (1-5)

Skill Alignment

40%

Leadership

Developing leadership skills

5

Career Goals

25%

Management Track

Aspiring manager

4

Department

15%

Marketing

Marketing

5

Communication Style

10%

Monthly video calls

Flexible

3

Location/Time Zone

10%

EST

EST

5

Matching Template (Fillable Table)

Use this table to document your matches, criteria used, and evaluation notes.

Replicate rows as needed.

Mentor Name

Mentee Name

Matching Criteria Summary

Matching Method

Match Score

Notes

Lisa M.

Kevin R.

Skills: Project Mgmt, Career Goal: Tech Lead

Hybrid

92%

Aligned in goals and location

Brian T.

Sara K.

Skills: Presentation, Dept: HR

Algorithmic

85%

Will monitor initial engagement

           

 

 

Inclusive Matching: Supporting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Ensure the matching process supports diversity, equity, and inclusion:

  • Offer opt-in identity-based matching for shared lived experiences.
  • Anonymize profiles during matching to minimize bias.
  • Match based on preferred communication methods and accessibility needs.
  • Align availability across time zones and schedules.
  • Balance demographic diversity while respecting comfort levels.
  • Recognize intersectionality in participant identities.
  • Provide cultural competency resources for mentors and mentees.
  • Encourage open dialogue about goals and boundaries.
  • Track equity outcomes to identify participation gaps.
  • Allow easy re-matching when needed.
  • Adjust criteria weightings to support DEI goals.
  • Support affinity group or ERG-based matching options.

 

Mid-Program Matching Evaluation

Checking in mid-way through the program helps identify successful matches and address challenges early.

Pair

Engagement Frequency

Satisfaction (1–5)

Issues Noted

Adjustment Needed?

Lisa M. / Kevin R.

Bi-weekly

4

None

No

Brian T. / Sara K.

Monthly

3

Scheduling issues

Consider re-matching

         

 

 

Discussion Prompts (Mid-Program Check-In)

  • Is the mentor-mentee communication regular and productive?
      • Are both parties consistently showing up and engaging in meaningful dialogue?
      • Has a preferred cadence (weekly, bi-weekly, monthly) been established and maintained?
      • Are conversations goal-oriented, or drifting off-topic?
  • Are expectations aligned between both parties?
      • Did the mentor and mentee set clear goals and boundaries at the start?
      • Are they both aware of and committed to the goals of the relationship?
      • Is one party leading too much or too little?
  • Is re-matching necessary to meet development goals?
    • Are there persistent mismatches in expertise, communication styles, or availability?
    • Has progress stalled due to misalignment in values, pace, or commitment?
    • Could another mentor or mentee better support the participant's goals?

 

Final Matching Reflection

Assess the match effectiveness at the program’s conclusion to inform future cycles.

Pair

Relationship Outcome

Key Success Factor

Recommendations

Lisa M. / Kevin R.

Continued post-program

Aligned goals

Recommend for future programs

Brian T. / Sara K.

Concluded after 2 months

Communication gaps

Improve onboarding process

 

Continuous Matching Improvement

Post-program analysis is essential to evolve the matching strategy.

  • Review feedback and satisfaction ratings
  • Adjust matching criteria weights as needed
  • Update mentor/mentee profiles based on experience
  • Leverage Qooper’s analytics to refine future pairings

 

Conclusion

Establishing thoughtful, data-informed mentor-mentee matches is fundamental to the success of any mentorship program. Whether the goal is leadership development, onboarding, diversity and inclusion, or career advancement, effective matching lays the groundwork for purposeful, productive, and lasting mentoring relationships. By aligning participants based on shared goals, relevant expertise, and communication preferences, organizations can foster stronger engagement, accelerate learning, and increase the overall impact of their programs.

With Qooper, these efforts are further enhanced through intelligent matching algorithms, customizable criteria, and continuous monitoring. Investing in a scalable, structured matching solution not only improves individual mentorship outcomes but also supports long-term talent development and a more connected organizational culture.

You can access all of our Templates in a single location. This includes templates for mentoring programs, pulse surveys, onboarding, training resources, and other tools designed to support effective program management. Explore the full range of templates here.

Want to explore more?

Discover how Qooper can help your organizational goals and people development today.